ქართ | Eng

ISSN 2449-2396 (Print) | E ISSN 2449-2612 (Online)

JEL Classifications: L83, D81, M1, I00


https://doi.org/10.35945/gb.2022.13.024



DECISION-MAKING PROCESS DURING ONLINE GAMBLING: AN INTEGRATION OF GLOBAL APPROACHES AND OTHER FACTORS (A CASE OF GEORGIA)

Author: Ana Elizarova | Published: 2022-05-17 | Pages: 154-159

Full Text

For Citation: Elizarova, A. (2022). Decision-Making Process during Online Gambling: an Integration of Global Approaches and Other Factors (A Case of Georgia). Globalization and Business. 13, 154-159. https://doi.org/10.35945/gb.2022.13.024

Abstract

Since the dawn of the computer and internet era, many online users have exploded, and more people are using the Internet to spend their money online. Georgia is well-known and well-positioned as a regional gambling hotspot. Gambling is a strategically vital and financially lucrative industry for the country. Gambling business plays a crucial role in the Georgian economy by contributing to its budget revenues via income generated from licenses and spending of foreign tourists and increasing employment by hiring a steadily increased number of employees in the field. Gambling is a steadily growing industry with an increasing number of players raises several behavioral questions on why so many people decide to play online and the main factors that determine and affect their choices. Even though online gambling is a strategically important and financially attractive field for Georgia, it is, at the same time, a source of many social problems such as gambling addiction, the involvement of adults, and financial problems. Gamblers maintain behavioral habits by attempting to deny concerns and a false sense of control. As a result, gambling becomes the most important activity in a person's life. Its nature is so broad that it complicates the process and makes it difficult for gamblers to recover. Therefore, this case requires a thorough study from various perspectives. These aspects lack scientific studies of the local market or other related research papers that add novelty to the Georgian online gambling segment. This research examines several traditional approaches to gambling behavior, their proclivity for problem gambling, and the primary elements that influence it.


Keywords

Problem Gambling, Decision-Making Process, Risky Behavior, Preference, Approaches To Gambling


References

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.

Ayton, P., & Fischer, I. (2004). The Hot Hand Fallacy and the Gambler's Fallacy: Two Faces of Subjective Randomness? Memory & Cognition. 32 (8), 1369-1378.

Cowan, J. L. (1969). The Gambler's Fallacy. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 30 (2), 238-251.

Carlson, K. A., & Shu, S. B. (2007). The Rule of Three: How the Third Event Signals the Emergence of a Streak. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 104 (1), 113-121.

Clark, L., Lawrence, A. J., Astley-Jones, F., & Gray, N. (2009). Gambling Near-misses Enhance Motivation to Gamble and Recruit Win-Related Brain Circuitry. Neuron. 61(3), 481-490.

Clark, L. (2010). Decision-making during Gambling: an Integration of Cognitive and Psychobiological Approaches. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 365 (1538), 319-330.

Derevensky, J. L., Gupta, R., & Baboushkin, H. R. (2007). Underlying Cognitions in Children's Gambling Behavior: Can They Be Modified? International Gambling Studies. 7 (3), 281-298.

Fortune, E. E., & Goodie, A. S. (2012). Cognitive Distortions as a Component and Treatment Focus of Pathological Gambling: a Review. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 26 (2), 298.

Griffiths, M. (1991). Psychobiology of the Near-miss in Fruit Machine Gambling. The Journal of Psychology. 125 (3), 347-357.

Griffiths, M. D. (1994). The Role of Cognitive Bias and Skill in Fruit Machine Gambling. British Journal of Psychology. 85 (3), 351-369.

Gigerenzer, G. (2003). Reckoning with Risk: Learning to Live with Uncertainty. Penguin UK.

Henslin, J. M. (1967). Craps and Magic. American Journal of Sociology. 73 (3), 316-330.

Joukhador, J., Maccallum, F., & Blaszczynski, A. (2003). Differences in Cognitive Distortions between Problem and Social Gamblers. Psychological Reports. 92 (3), 1203-1214.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2013). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. In Handbook of the Fundamentals of Financial Decision Making: Part I. (99-127).

Khani, A., & Rainer, G. (2016). Neural and Neurochemical Basis of Reinforcement-guided Decision Making. Journal of Neurophysiology. 116 (2), 724-741.

Lachance, S., Doucet, C., & Leblond, J. (2003). Group Therapy for Pathological Gamblers: A Cognitive Approach. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 41 (5), 587-596.

Langer, E. J. (1975). The Illusion of Control. Journal of personality and social psychology. 32(2), 311.

Ladouceur, R., & Mayrand, M. (1987). The Level of Involvement and the Timing of Betting in Roulette. The Journal of Psychology. 121 (2), 169-176.

Orgaz, C., Estévez, A., & Matute, H. (2013). Pathological Gamblers Are More Vulnerable to the Illusion of Control in a Standard Associative Learning Task. Frontiers in psychology. 4, 306.

Petry, N. M., & Roll, J. M. (2001, July). A Behavioral Approach to Understanding and Treating Pathological Gambling. In Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry. 6 (3), 177-183.

Park, B. W., & Ahn, J. H. (2010). Policy Analysis for Online Game Addiction Problems. System Dynamics Review. 26 (2), 117-138.

Raylu, N., & Oei, T. P. (2004). The Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS): Development, Confirmatory Factor Validation and Psychometric Properties. Addiction. 99 (6), 757-769.

Saldaña, J. (2021). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Sage.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in the Law of Small Numbers. Psychological Bulletin. 76 (2), 105.

Takahashi, H., Fujie, S., Camerer, C., Arakawa, R., Takano, H., Kodaka, F., & Suhara, T. (2013). Norepinephrine Is the Brain Associated with Aversion to Financial Loss. Molecular Psychiatry. 18 (1), 3-4.

Takahashi, H., Matsui, H., Camerer, C., Takano, H., Kodaka, F., Ideno, T., & Suhara, T. (2010). Dopamine D1 Receptors and Nonlinear Probability Weighting in Risky Choice. Journal of Neuroscience. 30 (49), 16567-16572.

Walker, M. B. (1992). Irrational Thinking among Slot Machine Players. Journal of Gambling Studies. 8 (3), 245-261.

World Health Organization. (1992). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioral disorders: clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. World Health Organization.

Wood, R. T., & Griffiths, M. D. (2008). Why Swedish People Play Online Poker and Factors that Can Increase or Decrease Trust in Poker Websites: A qualitative Investigation. Journal of Gambling Issues. (21), 80-97.

Globalization & Business European University European University European University mes.gov.ge erih plus mes.gov.ge EBSCO index copernicus Google Scholar Crossref Open Academic Journals Index ISSN WorldCat Microsoft Academic Dimensions DRJI The National Parliamentary Library of Georgia Internet Archive