ქართ | Eng

ISSN 2449-2396 (Print) | E ISSN 2449-2612 (Online)

JEL Classifications: F14, F21, F60


GLOBALIZATION AND MAIN TRENDS OF GLOBAL ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE: TRADE AND INVESTMENTS

Author: Emir Eteria | Published: 2019-12-27 | Pages: 90 - 95

Full Text

For Citation: Eteria, E. (2019). Globalization and Main Trends of Global Economic Performance: Trade and Investments. Globalization And Business, #8, pp. 90-95.

Abstract

Globalization and its impact on developing and transition economies are among most debated issues in social sciences. Globalization is multidimensional, multipart and multispeed phenomena affecting all countries and nations in the world. However, economic dimension of globalization could be considered as foundation as well as determinant of development of other forms of globalization, including political and social globalization. It is obvious, that economic globalization intensifies cooperation as well as competition on regional and global level and therefore, enhances economic and political interdependence among countries.

There are many conflicting approaches towards globalization. However, a leading form of globalization still is neoliberal globalization, while other perspectives are opposing ideas to neoliberal globalization. A fundamental idea of neoliberal economic globalization is socalled “small government” and openness for trade and investment, which has been considered as a necessary precondition for economic development of any nation in the world since 1980s. Noteworthy, that major negative aspects of neoliberal globalization, underlined by “skeptics” are negative effects of neoliberal globalization on trade and investment performance of developing and transition economies.

Conducted analysis of trade and investment performance of developing and transition economies demonstrates their growing involvement in globalizing world economy. Ac- cording to data of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), during 1990-2018, exports an- nual average growth rates of developing and transition countries were 9,5% and 8,8% respectively, while exports annual average growth rate of developed countries was 5,7%. More - over, in 1990-2018, imports annual average growth rates of developing and transition countries were 9,3% and 7,7% respectively, while imports average growth rate of developed countries was 5, 9%. It is clear, that besides trade, Foreign Direct Investment is the major indicator to evaluate countries/ country groups’ involvement in globalization.   Noteworthy, that between 1990 and 2000 average share of developing countries in world Foreign Direct Investments (inward) was 29,3%, in 2001-2010 was 34, 4%, while in 2011-2018 aver- age share was 44, 2%. In 2018, developing countries share in inward world Foreign Direct Investments was 54, 4%, while developed countries share was 42, 9%. It is clear, that countries/country groups’ involvement in the international capital movement and in globalization processes in general, depends not only on inward Foreign Direct Investments, but also on outward FDIs.   In 1990-2000, average share of developing countries in outward FDIs was 10,4%, in 2001-2010 was 14,1%, while in 2011-2018 average share of developing countries in outward world FDIs significantly increased and reached 30,1%. The data underlines an intensification of trade relations of transition and developing countries as well as their increased openness for Foreign Direct Investments and rising share in outward world FDIs.

As a result, during 1990-2018, developing and transition countries involvement  in globalizing world economy significantly increased via increased trade relations and growing participation in movement of Foreign Direct Invest- ments. Consequently, despite some setbacks, economic globalization remains as the leading characteristic of the world economic development and process of deglobalization is not evident.


Keywords

GLOBALIZATION, NATION STATE; DEVELOPING AND TRANSITION ECONOMIES, TRADE, INVESTMENTS


References

  1. Bedianashvili, G. (2016). The Global Business Environment, European Integration and the Cultural Potential of Social-economic Development of Georgia. Journal “Globalization and Business”. №1, pp. 19-25 (in Georgian).
  2. Bhagwati, J. (2004). In Defense of Globalization, Oxford University Press.
  3. Castels, M. (2000). Global Economy, in The Global Transformations reader : an introduction to the globalization debate. Held, D. and McGrew, A. G. (eds), Cambridge: Polity.
  4. Eteria, E. (2006). A Comparative Analysis of Modern Concepts of Globalization. Journal “Ekonomika”, #11-12, pp. 110-116, (in Georgian).
  5. Eteria, E. (2009). Globalization and National Economy: Theory and Policy. Tbilisi, “Universali”, (in Georgian).
  6. Eteria, E. (2019). Economic Globalization and Regional Trade Agreements: Recent Developments, Ekonomisti, Vol. XV, №1, pp. 86-93.
  7. Frenkel, J. (2000). Globalization of the Economy. In Governance in a globalizing world. Nye, J. S. and Donahue, J. D. (eds.), Brookings Institution Press.
  8. Friedman, T. L. (2007). The World is Flat: a Brief History of the Twenty-first Century. Picador.
  9. Grinddle, M. S. (2000). Ready or Not: The Developing World and Globalization. In Governance in a globalizing world. Nye, J. S. and Donahue, J. D. (eds.), Brookings Institution Press.
  10. Gritch, M. “The Nation-State and Economic Globalization: Soft Geo-Politics and Increased State Autonomy?” Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 12, No. 1, Aspects of Globalization (Feb., 2005), pp. 1-25
  11. Hirst, P., Thompson, G. (1999). Globalization in Question: the International Economy and the Possibilities of Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press; Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
  12. Mekvabishvili, E. (2016). Unity of Globalization and Modernization – The Modern Economic Development Paradigm, Journal “Globalization and Business”, №2, pp. 30-36 (in Georgian);
  13. Mekvabishvili, E. (2018). The Financial Crisis of the Globalization Era and the Economy of Georgia. Tbilisi, “Inteleqti” (in Georgian)
  14. Nye, J. S. and Donahue, J. D. (eds.), (2000). Governance in a Globalizing World. Brookings Institution Press.
  15. Putkaradze, R. (2007). Directions of International Trade Development under Globalization. Journal “Georgian Economy”, №5, pp. 67-71 (in Georgian).
  16. Rodrik, D. (2011). The Globalization Paradox : Democracy and the Future of the World Economy. New York; London: W. W. Norton & Co.
  17. Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and its Discontents. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
  18. Stiglitz, J. E. (2007). Making Globalization Work. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
  19. Shaw M. “The State of Globalization: Towards a Theory of State Transformation.” (Autumn, 1997), Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 4, No. 3, The Direction of Contemporary Capitalism pp. 497-513
  20. Scholte, J. A.  (2005). Globalization: A Critical Introduction. Palgrave Macmillan;
  21. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/the World Bank. (1997). World Development Report: The State in a Changing World. Oxford University Press.
  22. Weiss, L. (1999). “Globalization and National Governance: Antinomy or Interdependence?” Review of International Studies, Special Issue, 25 (5), December, pp. 59-88
  23. Wolf, M. (2005). Why Globalization Works. Yale University Press; 2nd edition.
  24. UNCTAD statistics; https://unctadstat.unctad.org

Globalization & Business European University European University European University mes.gov.ge erih plus mes.gov.ge EBSCO index copernicus Google Scholar Crossref Open Academic Journals Index Scientific Indexing Services International Scientific Indexing Daugavpils University